I’ve been thinking about going back through my Flickr photos and releasing some of them under an attribute CC license. Previously, the photo on the left was picked to represent Sir Harold Kroto by someone on Wikipedia partly because it was available under a CC license. (Wow… It still is?)
The quandary is more what should license?
Everything?
Some of the specific kinds like flowers or places?
Should I even bother?
Related posts
Tags: creative commons, nobel laureate, Photography, Sir Harold Kroto
-
My own policy is to CC license anything that doesn’t include recognizable friends and family. Usually that means shots without any people in it, but the intention is to share broadly my creative work and protect the personal stuff.
1 comment
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://www.ezrasf.com/wplog/2008/07/22/creative-commons/trackback/