William borrowed my camera to go on his honeymoon. He also lost the photos with a poorly timed crash & drive reformat. So he wants to borrow the card and recover the data. Thankfully I have not used the camera since he returned it despite thinking I should.
Luckily I ran across A Computer Repair Utility Kit You Can Run From a Thumb Drive.
I didn’t like the setup of Photorec as it runs through the command line. Navigating the tree was confusing at best. It did recover 1,166 photos / 3.62GB for me.
Not trusting a single method, I also tried Recuva. That worked a little better. It reported 1,395 files found. However, 177 were unrecoverable. Getting 1,218 pictures / 3.78GB back was 52 / 160MB better than Photorec. Though many of the “recovered” pictures just say: Invalid Image. Maybe they really are Raw?
While trying to use Restoration, it crashed the first time. Not sure why. It was fine the next time, though it only found 4 photos.
Filename: Photorec doesn’t restore files with anything like the original name. Recuva and Restoration do.
Meta Data: OSes and image editors know about the EXIF data in pictures. All the Photorec pictures have date taken. Most of the Recuva pictures do. Guess I could see if only 52 pictures are missing the EXIF? That might explain why Photorec lost some of them.
All in all, it was an fun experiment. I am not curious how these stack up against of the proprietary software? Why pay $40 when these are better?