-
Pingback from Too Much | Rants, Raves, and Rhetoric v4 on May 31, 2010 at 10:57 am
-
The use of the pseudonym for the person who has been in the news is simple – including it would make finding the blog post by searching THAT person’s name too easy. People can find ME if they try, but people who just search for the person who was in the news story (who knew that person OR who have joined the Googling hordes in the height of the media frenzy – you won’t believe how involved some creepy strangers will get in a tragedy that does not involve them personally in any way) will be unlikely to find the post.
Now, if someone happens upon the post because they follow my blog, because they know me or just by happenstance – yes, they will know what news story is being referred to. I have always asked my regular readers that, should they ever refer to posts that mention events covered in the news, they simply don’t use the (easily gleaned) actual names so that the breadcrumbs won’t lead gawkers to my doorstep.
I think discussing tragedy and it’s personal impact is something I have to share. I hope it serves a purpose. It has led me to meeting new people and making connections with others who have suffered similar losses. I just want to be able to discuss things frankly and honestly without attracting the rubber-neck crowd or the media. Here’s hoping.
I have found other bloggers and blog visitors surprisingly respectful and understanding of my desire for a modicum of privacy. Their desire to avoid doing anything to “break” the anonymity has been a blessing. I hope I continue to be so fortunate.
-
Also, thank you. It’s been a hard road. I guess I just need a quiet place to talk about it. And, as you indicated, in person is so difficult. It’s too much for most.

3 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://www.ezrasf.com/wplog/2009/09/12/online-intimacy/trackback/